Morning Becomes Electric: Post-Modern Scholarly Information Access, Organization, and Navigation
July 4, 2008
Morning Becomes Electric: Post-Modern Scholarly Information Access, Organization, and Navigation
Morning Becomes Electric: Post-Modern Scholarly Information Access, Organization, and Navigation
“The Best Way to Predict the Future is to Invent It” / Alan Kay
Gerry McKiernan
Associate Professor
Science and Technology Librarian and Bibliographer
Iowa State University Library
Ames IA 50011
Abstract
Scholars are facing unprecedented Information Overload in their attempts to identify potentially relevant information sources. Electronic networks have not only expedited traditional forms of publishing but created new formal and informal opportunities for communication. Conventional methods of information management are reaching the limits of their effectiveness. To enhance access to information in the coming decades, systems that fully utilize the digital nature of a growing number of scholarly resources must be implemented.
Indexing and Abstracting Services
Transformational Communication
- Intelligent Software Agents
- Information Overload
- Custom-Configured Institutional E-Journals
- Just-in-Time Electronic Collections
Original Available At
[http://www.public.iastate.edu/~CYBERSTACKS/Morning.htm]
See Also
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mourning_Becomes_Electra]
Wikis As Environments For Mitigating/Reducing Plagiarism?
Friends/
In a report of a presentation on “Using Wikipedia to Reenvision the Term Paper” by Andreas Brockhau and Martha Groom of University of Washington Bothell, mention is made of many benefits that arise as a result of writing for/in Wikipedia.
Among these are the following:
Groom’s first attempt at incorporating Wikipedia into a class came in the fall of 2006, when she required her students to make a major revision required her students to make a major revision to an existing article or to create one of their own, with a minimum of 1,500 words, for 60 percent of the grade. The assignment, for her course on environmental history and globalization, encompassed an initial proposal, a first draft, revisions and [internal] peer review …
“The shift to thinking about placing the term paper as a Wikipedia encyclopedia entry allows for another level of peer review,” Groom said. Such entries have references and citations; allow for a process of repeated, continual editing; and encourage collaborations between authors.
They also reach a much wider audience, through the Wikipedia site and search engines. “How do you motivate students to do their best work?” she asked — implying that the answer lies in the possibility of others viewing it. The public nature of Wikipedia content also means that, in theory, students would be less likely to reuse others’ material as their own.
“[The Wikipedia guidelines] very clearly state that … the onus is on you, not on them, so you’ll be the one who catches anything if you [post] any copyrighted material,” said Andreas Brockhaus, the manager of learning technologies at the university.
There was another positive effect on her students’ work, Groom said: their assignments were generally better written.
[http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/10/29/wikipedia]
Question Of The Day: To What Degree and By What Means Can Wiki-Based Writing Mitigate/Reduce PLAGIARISM in the Writing of Students / Researchers / Scholars?
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiarism]
>>I’m Particularly Interested in **Non-Wikipedia** Wiki-Writing Environments< <
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki]
***PLEASE RESPOND BY COMMENTING ON THIS POSTING***
Thanks!
/Gerry
Ohio used books listings…
[...] discuss, post in the comments section and we’ll get going. Meanwhile, I’ll be reading the mountain of great books by the authors who are coming. It’s a tough job, right book addicts? Next post: The Giller Prize Long [...]…